There were more limousines parked outside the Church of Heavenly Rest yesterday than there are parked outside M-40, Jay Z’s club, on a Thursday night. I was there with hundreds of others to pay my respects to Louis Auchincloss. And no, it was not entirely a Harold and Maude like moment. I babysat for his boys one summer. Anyway, great story tellers often become the stuff of great stories themselves. Even the non-story about the reclusive J.D. Salinger became a great story. This is what I thought as I sat in my pew and listened to friends and family talk about his life. Lawyer, man of letters, “professional New Yorker,” Louis (pronounced Louie like the old Louie Louie song) died at the venerable age of 92 last week. But everything about the man seemed venerable even when I met him as a young girl. He was in his mid-fifties then. Lean with a beaky nose and extremely delicate hands. Long slender fingers. Thin lips. Dark penetrating eyes. He spoke with that old-fashioned English, mid-Atlantic, voice I associate with George Plimpton and Bill Buckley.
Joe Kanon, editor, novelist, and once-upon-a-time publisher of Houghton Mifflin spoke of that “stentorian” voice; of how even when used in a stage-whisper, it often silenced an entire restaurant. “Gossip was just another form of story telling for Louis. And everyone, including waiters, wanted to eavesdrop.” He also spoke of his “work” with Mr. Auchincloss. “Work”,” he said “that consisted primarily of arranging launch parties and long lunches for the two of us. Because Louie was so good and such a perfectionist, he didn’t need an editor.” (With over 60 books listed on Amazon, there must have been a hell of a lot of parties, I thought.) Then he mentioned a lunch right after Louis had received a call from Martin Scorsese.
“He wants me to work on his new movie, The Age of Innocence,” Louis told me.
“Doing what?” I said. “Surely not writing.”
“No, of course not, Joe. They want me to talk.”
“Talk?” I said.
“Yes, yes,” he said, impatiently. “They want me on the set so the cast can hear how people spoke back in Edith’s day. (Edith being Wharton. Dead for the past 73 years or so.)
“But Louis,” I said. “No one talks like you. No one ever did.”
“Yes, but they won’t know that,” he laughed.
There was the story of another call he received at his law office that I loved, too.
“Louis had asked his secretary not to disturb him. He was in conference, discussing a last will and testament. Twenty minutes into the meeting, the secretary poked her head through the door.
“I’m sorry,” she said. “But you’ll want to take this.”
“I asked for no calls,” Louis said.
“But it’s the Pope.”
Louis took it.
What would the Pope want to chat about with a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant like Auchincloss, I wondered. I also wondered if the man had chosen Estate work on purpose; for the sake of his writing. Money was one of his most obsessive subjects. And with the exception of divorce, nothing reveals more about our feelings about money, not to mention other human beings, than the prospect of death.
There were stories about travelling with Auchincloss from the formidable Evelyn Halpert, one of his oldest friends and the former headmistress of the Brearley School.
“If we were driving, well, if I was driving, through a particularly flat or boring region of France, let’s say, Louis would sit in the back seat and entertain us by reciting stanzas of Racine’s poetry. He knew them all by heart.”
“Just keeping up with my French,” Louis would say.
“But nobody speaks 17th century French anymore, Louis.”
“I do,” he would say before launching into a bit of Corneille.”
Obviously, my relationship with Mr. Auchincloss wasn’t quite as intimate. I saw him only from a “safe” distance. I did know that he was working on his Wharton book that summer because we traveled, briefly, to Newport. But most of the time, we “children” lived separate lives. When we visited the house up on Lake Champlain, for instance, we stayed in a cottage within shouting distance (not that I ever remember anyone shouting at the Auchincloss’s) of what we called “the grown up’s” house. The boundaries here between children and grown-ups couldn’t have been more precisely or painlessly defined. Children dropped by after lunch then again during cocktails. Afternoons were also sometimes spent in grown-up company. Sailing, mostly. Otherwise, we inhabited our own blissfully peaceful, private world. A world of reading (there was no television in either of their houses), swimming, picnicking and napping. (during which time I was free to sunbathe on a deserted back below the cottage.) In short, this was not a place where parents were ever mistaken for friends. There was no warring between the two camps. Just mutual respect and a tacit belief that children grew more healthily without the constant surveillance and smothering presence of adults. (Is it coincidence? The connection between the words mother and smother?)
The end tomorrow. If I succeed in posting the fucker. Pardon the 21st century English.